Saturday, December 20, 2008

MHO: Branding MisConception...


In developed country, the risk of getting unreliable product has decreased as stated by Mercer Management Journal. Simply because the quality gap between retailer branding and branded product have decreased significantly.


# Misconception 1 – Brand are built mainly through advertising


Author subsequently claims that consumers experiences also important. I disagree with author; however, although, consumers’ experiences count, but it does not represent the whole branding effort. I agree that brand building does not depend merely on advertising, but also not merely on consumer’s experiences. Instead, brand building should be a systematic process to achieve the desire brand position in the competing market. Band building does not limited to only advertising, or creating favorable consumers experiences but it also involves utilizing multiple touch-point to achieve multiple brand building objective; each touch-point is to achieve a particular brand building objectives, e.g. advertising through TVC to create mass awareness, In store product sample to create trial to build consumer experiences, and more. In short, brand building required a concerted effort to support the systematic brand building process through every different stage in the process which aims to achieve a particular brand building objective.


# Misconception 2 – Brand are used primarily to influence customer


It is very true; Brands are not used primarily to influence consumers anymore, it can be used to influence investors and talent too. Powerful brands are able to convince talent to join the organization. Powerful brands also influence investor’s choices in placing their investment. However, one area which organizations neglect is employee’s perception towards your brands. As the proverb said, ‘Charity begins at home’, the strength of the brand is first nurtured within the organization; organizations must ensure that employees understand the brand essence and respect the brands and look up to the brands. Employees are important massager of the organization as they play an important role in consumer service cycle. They are the brand ambassador, and how they carry the brand personality contributes partly to consumers experiences with the company and is influencing the product experience as well.


# Misconception 3 – The key to successful brand management involves understanding the effectiveness of the brand in today’s marketplace


It is true that a brand must always remain relevancy to consumers. As the time goes by, when a brand has achieve significant market position or becoming the leader in the industry; Self Complacent kicks in. Brand ‘builder’ tends to be complacent, and in denial of change in the environment, and will gradually lose the relevancy with consumers.


# Misconception 4 – Brands are symbolic and emotive and therefore are managed primarily through creativity rather than analysis


Analysis is paramount to brand building. Creativity without conclusive analysis is tantamount to ‘a blind man with machine gun’ – shoot without aim, or unable to aim. Analysis of the market can tell you area of focus by importance, and it also tells you area of improvement to be better. Merely relying on creativity is insufficient if aims to strengthen the brand, you need to know what, why, and how in making ‘creativity’ possible and relevant to consumers.


# Misconception 5 – Brands are the responsibility of the department


Brand is the responsibility of everyone in the organization. Everyone plays a role in brand building process. The pillars to the brands are the ‘love and passion’ to the brands of the people in organization, the more ‘love and passion’ you have, the greater the strength of the brands…When people have love and passion to the brand, they will contribute more to the brands, a concerted effort is notice to take care of the brand and grow it to the next level…

MHO: Common Wedgwood....

MHO: Sharing....

Sunday, December 14, 2008

MHO: Immutable law of marketing


Immutable law of marketing has in fact not immutable, and is arguable for a few laws…


The Law of Leadership can not sustain the retaliation from the leader in the market…thus it may not be applicable if you are ‘already’ in No.2 position…


Being the first isn’t always won; unless you dominated the ‘very first’ position in the market. Otherwise, you just have to keep trying. You can be the first in the market for anything within your category but if you are not the first to the market; you are not match to the leader’s retaliation. For example, assume you are No.2 in the detergent market, and you launched a newly create detergent that kills germ in a minute to target the hygienic market; you are the first to launch a laundry detergent that anti germ. However, if you are the No.2 player in the market with a huge gap versus the leader in term of market share, you either have to be very good in your marketing skills or lose out to the leader when the leader retaliates. Predominantly, as a leader of the market already enjoy a positive and significant brand equity, brand trust and also brand affinity with the target market; which all these help to double effectiveness of me-too strategy. Thus a leader’s me-too strategy is likely to drawn your ‘most’ creative product launch.


The law of category


You can win by creating a new category, but you can’t win if it can easily be copied or duplicated. Again, you can win beautifully if you are already the No.1 in the market. The first law precedes all…

The law of mind


Being the first to market is important to determine if you are the first in the mind; company fails because they are resting at their laurel when No.1 is achieved through being the first to the marketplace, yet forgetting to create the first in consumer mind, then competitors slowly creep in. To win a war, company needs to always push, push and push…never give up.


The law of perception


Win consumers perception means you win the war; yet you also have to win the perception of what you want other to perceive. You win if you manage to get consumer to perceive what you want them to see you…

The law of focus and exclusivity…


You just got to own a word; for example, Post office express mail owns the word ‘speed’, Volvo owns the words safety, but owning a word does not grant you any advantage if it is not what the consumer wants…

Saturday, November 29, 2008

MHO: High vs Low Credibility, Favourability vs. Confidence

In a research conducted to test the degree of credibility of medium in relation to the degree of favourability and confidence; Respodents was asked to fill up a set of questions before and after the message communicated...


Low credibility figure command less favorably in pre-message period, but command higher favorability post message…


Low credibility command high confidence level during pre message but command lower confidence level during post message level..



Saturday, November 22, 2008

MHO: Physically Attractiveness


Physically attractiveness model are more effective in endorsing product that is "romantically oriented"! such as....Perfume....Sport Car...